PDA

View Full Version : Tank Sizes


El Pirata
05-31-2005, 02:49 PM
Has anyone ever wondered why there is no tank size between 45ci and 68ci? Don't remind me about that 47ci 3k tank. For the most part you have a 45, 68, 72, 88, 92, and 114. Why is there not like a 55 or 60ci tank?

alohn2000
06-01-2005, 03:50 AM
I'm just guessing here, but I'd say the companies figure that you probley wouldn't see much of a use for a 55-60ci tank. 45 is great for a front man, 68 for all around and everything else is just overkill to me, but thats just my guess.

El Pirata
06-01-2005, 04:18 AM
Yeah but for those of us, and I know several dozen players when fit this category, a 45 is just a hair too small and a 68 is way too big.

alohn2000
06-01-2005, 06:56 AM
Ahh, got me there then.

Bigal1
06-01-2005, 09:16 PM
Has anyone ever wondered why there is no tank size between 45ci and 68ci? Don't remind me about that 47ci 3k tank. For the most part you have a 45, 68, 72, 88, 92, and 114. Why is there not like a 55 or 60ci tank?

emmm....supply and demand?

or was that a rhetorical question... :cheers:

hans02
06-02-2005, 03:30 AM
I know, because the same people that determined the sizes of tanks, thought up the scoring for tennis?! (<-sarcasm) (Love, 15, 30, 40, ...) That makes no mathmatical sense, same with the lack of tank sizes between 45-68.