Your Explicit Pictures

[poppysgurl]

It is a shame that this site feels the need to exploit a beautiful woman for the purpose of trying to sell angel guns! It is also a shame that she should feel that her body is the only thing she can use to make herself known. If your angels can't sell themselves, maybe the production of them ought to be re-thought! It is also reprehensable that this site would place such photos on a site which depicts women who play paintball are only playing to be a "bunny". I know women who can kick any man's butt on a playing field, and it would be with their clothes ON!!! ie:Keely Watson!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Ekim]

:puzzled:

[Ekim]

:clap:

[KEN CRANE]

well sometimes people see things differently than others.ive learned to take everyones views and live and let live.sorry it was offensive.

[Emmit]

well I thought about keeping quiet on this but instead chose to address a couple of points. 1 was mentioned "Sex" sells. Whether it's perceived or implied it does. Now EVERY manufacturer out there knows this. JT, Kingman, Raven, Smart Parts, Extreme Rage, Kapp, BE, DYE, and yes WDP does as well. Now poppysgurl do you post this same message on every message board that is in any way shape or form related to these manufacturers or did you just choose to attack AOG specifically? Now you feel the need to specifically mention Keely Watson....I am certainly going to have to dispute this one. Have you seen any of her promotional items? Have you seen any of the photo shoots she's done for Maxim Magazine (a magazine that almost all men in there 20's enjoy reading)? How about the photo shoots that she's done for the Team Maxim website? Or some of the photo shoots the entire team of the Femmes Fatales have done for that matter?

Now here at Angel-Owners.com we do not advocate any pornography. There are some photos of scantily clad women, however there is no nudity of any sort, and these areas are well marked and you choose to enter that section of your own free will. We do try to be accomodating to our members when we can, we had one female member who has become a very active member who took offense to something on the website, and it was redesigned to make the entire population happy. If you have any good suggestions on how we can make our website more user friendly please feel free to voice them. However your bashing leaves much to be desired, especially seeing as how instead of gaining or contributing any useful information your only post is an attempt to start a large flame session. However we here at AOG pride ourselves on not having any out and out flames. If you'd like to engage in a respectable debate/conversation then we can certainly accomodate you. Until that time please take your foul potty mouth elsewhere.

[splatwarrior]

It's odd that Keely is brought into this because just the other day i saw her new Dye poster in a pro shop.Tight t-shirt and the string from her thong hiked up over her hip, seeing that her pants were far from being up where a normal person would wear theirs.Don't get me wrong Keely is a great player but she is also well aware of the fact that she is hot and Dye wants to use that to their advantage.

[Emmit]

but you see Splat that's what I was getting at. The original poster felt the need to use Keely as an example and yet DYE and Keely use the "sex" factor constantly!

[brian5]

hey, is'nt this a free country?

[HellFish]

boobies = good :clap:

[freeloader12345]

Hey, as long as i dont see a guy with his round twins and Mr. Stiffy hangin out im cool. but if the ladies dont like it move it!

[CAZ]

( .Y. )

[Luna Pier]

I agree with you Emmit 100%, you hit the nail right on the head.
Being a girl on this forum, I do feel that is taken into consideration. I am also not an idiot, I know sex sells. I thought most all of the population knew this.
Poppysgurl, you have no idea what you're talking about. You obviously were bored and had nothing better to do. The guys on this site are AMAZING. I've never had an issue with anyone. They're fair and treat the ladies with much respect. Take your bad attitude elsewhere and dish it out to people who really deserve it. Your wasting your time here.

Best, Luna

[Emmit]

Okay guys this is seriously starting to degrade into a flame which is exactly what we are normally devoid of here at AOG. If you can't post thought out responses in a dignified manner then please don't. If someone has a legitimate complaint we try to address it as professionally as possible.

Thanks

[splatwarrior]

RRReewww!Way to go Amy.it is too bad most of you have not had the opportunity to meet Amy because she is a stand up gal.And no I'm not just sucking up,cuz i know her boyfriend as well.

[Gary1]

I have to ask myself...would I have bought an Angel if it was advertised by, lets say, Charles Bronson or Shelly DuVal? YES!!!! "gurl" has the right to be offended, if images like those posted in FBT offend her, but girls and women dress like that on the beaches every summer, don't they? As a certain radio personality says..."we live here in the United States of the Offended"...

[Knick Knack]

Did any of you think about the actual nudity on the site located at edited ?

Maybe she was talking about that, and not the FBT...either way, I'm with kenny, if it bugs you, dont watch.

Knick Knack

[Emmit]

Originally posted by Knick Knack
Did any of you think about the actual nudity on the site located at edited?

Maybe she was talking about that, and not the FBT...either way, I'm with kenny, if it bugs you, dont watch.

Knick Knack


Again........that is very plainly marked and you have to look hard for that. However that was a WDP photo shoot, not an AOG shoot, and it's certainly no worse than the KAPP poster of Lisa Harvey in a wet t-shirt.

[Gary1]

17,433 views on the FBT thread...WOW! Is this the first complaint?

[matthepepe]

we may have had one other female make a comment about it but never to this porportion. They were cool about it. On the other hand the page w/ the nudity has taken about 4130 views and not one complaint about that until now. So im not going to cahnge something for one person. Its ok if htey want to state their opinion i have no right to stop them from doing that, but its not going to change the state of the forums.

[Gary1]

If it was porn, that would be different...but this is just nudity. Nobody was holding a gun to the model's head. She was just displaying what was given to her (or in some cases, what they bought). I agree...opinions built this country.

[Duracell]

When we purchas our angels, im sure most of us have done lots of research on it, i know i did. It's very unlikely that someone would pay over a grand on something they bairly knew about. Being that "sex sells," people dont buy angels just because there are beautiful woman standing beside them. There great guns, period. Poppysgurl, usu. when woman are photographed nude, they know what their getting into, it's not like she agreed to it as long as know one saw the photos (great first poast by the way). Besides if your going to start going into the whole "don't exploit woman to sell products" you in way over your head. Anyway, aren't angels sexy enough as is? The topless woman is just a plus!

[shockwave 87]

I also agree with emmit all the way. Not to mention the Hundreds of thousands of angels which were sold to people who Have never even heard of the AOG and have never seen the "BUNNIES" page on the site.

p.s. It's not as if the people at WDP forced the gils to model in this way... It was done on their own free will

[Beercamel]

1. She has extremely low self-esteem and when she saw the pics of the pirk rack angel yielding beauty she became enraged in jealousy, then proceded to post.

2. We have nothing to worry about because with views like this i'm sure she will be struck down in a peace rally before the end of the year.:cheers:

[Prophet]

Beercamel, please do not attack or flame someone just because they made a statement about how they felt. poppysgurl made a statement about how she felt about some of the so called explicit pictures located on the site. Most of us are not offended, but she obvisously was. Does this mean we get to attack her for making that statement? No. Is she automatically 'jealous' or 'self-concious' about herself because of her statement about those pictures? No, she maybe, then again maybe not. Does that mean those so-called explicit pictures will be taken down? Probably not.

Please respect other members' opinions even if you don't agree with them.

[acoenfam1]

I personally think it might be a good idea to put this thread to rest. But i also agree with autarkis everyone is entitled to their opion and is free to voice it without others jumping on them. After all that's one of the things I like most about this site: lots of good advice with none of the "you dumb *&$#" comments.

[Gary1]

I second the motion!

[Prophet]

acoenfam1 is right.

Bang!

Thread is dead.

Heh. Locked.