top markers in facefull

[IwanaANGEL]

i was at borders cuz im too cheap to subscribe and I saw a mater tech force on the article about the best guns...
It was the FIRST one on the list!

[JTp8ntballer12]

alot of times its about who paid the magazine the most money, why do you think apg always gives spyders rave reviews...(well maybee just because the writers are newbs!). kinda good attention, and in the recent WPG from PGI the f4 got as good of a review as a dm4 and the a4 got a good review as well.

[MoogLe]

no surprise :wink:

[boathouse]

Meh, Facefull is constantly full of bullspit (as they say on the USA network). They gave CP barrels a crappy review and a Freak a good one.

[DarkHelmet931]

Meh, Facefull is constantly full of bullspit (as they say on the USA network). They gave CP barrels a crappy review and a Freak a good one.


they gave the CP pro kit good marks in bore quality and accuracy, they jsut didnt like the looks of the barrel that is why it got an average rating. I use the CP pro kit and love it.

If i remember correctly they gave the Freak kit all average marks.

However i kind of disagree with some of there marker ratings for instance how they gave almost all of the SP markers very good marks, and because they didnt give angels as good of marks as they should, but im a little bias.

[RaistlinsLegacy]

most companies are biased, however i have found that PB2X is extremely well written and avoids the biasness of other magazines,

[collin]

yeah but they had errors cause they said he dark ir3 was a a price and was mechanical

[DarkHelmet931]

most companies are biased, however i have found that PB2X is extremely well written and avoids the biasness of other magazines,

Faceful isent bias i thought they did a very good review section.

[JTp8ntballer12]

i like p8nt the best :)