View Full Version : Angel 4 Ugly?
frogkin
09-17-2003, 11:26 AM
I think the ir3 any version looks better than the angel 4. I hope the custom angel 4's look better. Does anyone agree?
Emmit
09-17-2003, 11:31 AM
nope.......the lines are smooth, and it flows nicely
C]-[iLDe
09-17-2003, 12:18 PM
Learn to be attracted to funtionality! The A4 will suddenly be gorgeous.
i think it looks 100 times better in person. very smooth lines
frogkin
09-17-2003, 01:58 PM
I think its lines are pretty good. But the minature pressure indicator looks ugly as does the feed and the volumizers look like a certain part of the male reproductive system.
Omikron
09-17-2003, 02:36 PM
Originally posted by frogkin
I think its lines are pretty good. But the minature pressure indicator looks ugly as does the feed and the volumizers look like a certain part of the male reproductive system.
Yeah I think the volumizers look like balls too.
desiree
09-17-2003, 07:24 PM
yea they definitaly look better up close.
frogkin
09-17-2003, 07:39 PM
They may look better up close but I still think wdp could of done better. Like with the ir3 we got the space grip something that was completely new that no other company had. With the angel 4 we got a speed with different milling a lcd screen and some other gizmos.
desiree
09-17-2003, 08:16 PM
they are also lighter and have a new bolt.
MoogLe
09-17-2003, 09:04 PM
i think they look pretty good although i do agree that ir3's are sexyer
lithium300mg
09-17-2003, 09:39 PM
sorry im' here i love anything that goes under the name angel so as all of us. sorry for speaking in the behalf of everyone but............................................... ..... i think thats how it goes
C]-[iLDe
09-17-2003, 10:54 PM
Actually, now that you mention it, i also like the look of the iR3/Speed space frame better than the A4...but i have yet to even HOLD an A4, so i wont prejudge.
Like i said, im attracted to functionality.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.